<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Fred Avolio's Musings   </title>
    <link>http://www.avolio.com/weblog</link>
    <description>Fred Avolio's Musings on Security and Other Topics</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>E-Mail Cleanup</title>
    <link>http://www.avolio.com/weblog/2008/07/22#EmailCleanup</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;
While this series of articles is Mac-specific and Mail-specific,
most of the tips offered can be used with other e-mail clients on
other platforms. It is all about productivity. I know people who have no
such scheme and are burdened by the guilt (or just stress) of hundreds
(or more) unread or &quot;undealtwith&quot; e-mails in their inbox.
&lt;p&gt;As the waiter in the 1971 television advertisement for Alka-Seltzer
urges his customer, &quot;Try it, you'll like it.&quot; Unlike the customer, trying
these suggestions should &lt;em&gt;lessen&lt;/em&gt; the need for an antacid.
&lt;P&gt;
See
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/article/133950/2008/06/emptyinbox1.html&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Turn down the volume on your e-mail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/article/134120/2008/06/emptyinbox2.html&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
The fast way to file your e-mail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/article/134139/2008/06/emptyinbox3.html&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Clean out old e-mail messages&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;mycomment&quot;&gt;
Here are other &lt;em&gt;excellent&lt;/em&gt; resources for getting a handle on e-mail.
And, as you probably know, handling ths problem is very important. 
(See the comment in
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/jul/20/psychology.mobilephones&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Hi-tech is turning us all into time-wasters&lt;/a&gt;,
that says, &quot;Even the beeps notifying the arrival of email are said to be causing a 0.5 per cent drop in gross domestic product in the United States, costing the economy $70bn a year.&quot;)
&lt;P&gt;
So, the additional resource:
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43folders.com/izero&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Inbox Zero&lt;/a&gt; and 
&lt;LI&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.43folders.com/2007/07/25/merlins-inbox-zero-talk&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
the Inbox Zero video&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Bother are from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.merlinmann.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Merlin Man&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Writing</title>
    <link>http://www.avolio.com/weblog/2008/07/18#style</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;
I like to write. I journal. I blog. I don't do either enough. I write, 
sometimes, for my day job. (But, writing for government contract 
deliverables&amp;mdash;and who else even talks like &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt;?&amp;mdash;is
something completely different, and can be life-sucking to a writer. But, 
I digress.)
I just can't seem to schedule a regular time to write, and this bugs me.
So, I need to find a way.
&lt;P&gt;All that to point to an excellent column by Kurt Vonnegut. If I read this
correctly, he wrote it in 1999. It popped up on a newsreader and I am pointing
it out to you.
It is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://literature.sdsu.edu/onWRITING/vonnegutSTYLE.html&quot;
target=&quot;__blank&quot;&gt;How to Write With Style&lt;/a&gt;. 
&lt;P&gt;If you write, please read it (it is very short). His summary:
&lt;OL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Find a subject you care about
&lt;LI&gt;Do not ramble, though
&lt;LI&gt;Keep it simple
&lt;LI&gt; Have guts to cut
&lt;LI&gt;Sound like yourself
&lt;LI&gt;Say what you mean
&lt;LI&gt;Pity the readers
&lt;/OL&gt;
</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Time Machine Failed Me</title>
    <link>http://www.avolio.com/weblog/2008/07/16#TimeMachine-rots</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;
I'm disappointed in this &quot;run it and forget it&quot; thing. Others have seen this. 
Most probably have not. I mentioned it in
&lt;a href=&quot;/weblog/pc2mac/leopard/TimeMachine.html&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Time Machine Error&lt;/a&gt;.  Well, it continued 
to happen. Sometimes it would fail with a 

&lt;a href=&quot;/pics/TM-error-popup.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
pop-up message&lt;/a&gt; saying, &quot;Time
Machine Error. Unable to complete backup. An error occurred while
creating the backup directory.&quot;
&lt;P&gt;Very helpful. What am &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt; supposed to make of that, let alone
Mom and Pop or Aunt Ida? So I opened Time Machine and 
clicked the red &quot;i&quot; in a circle, assuming it meant &quot;information.&quot; And 
&lt;a href=&quot;/pics/TM-error&quot;  target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; pop-up&lt;/a&gt; said... the exact same thing.
&lt;P&gt;
I turned off TM. I used Disk Utility to Verify and Repair. It would not verify
or repair. (If you are interested, the log is
&lt;a href=&quot;/data/TM-DiskUtilLog.txt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
here&lt;/a&gt;.)
&lt;P&gt;Now, Disk Utility helpfully tells you,
&quot;Click Repair Disk. If the repair fails, back up and erase the disk.&quot;
&lt;p&gt;
Back up where? And why? It is bad. Why back up a bad disk.
So, I have no choice but to erase it and start 
Time Machine captures again. Why? Why not? I am glad I routinely back up on another volume using SuperDuper!
&lt;P&gt;Oh, and I need to select &quot;Change Disk...&quot; in Time Machine and pick the
same, now zero-ed out, disk.
&lt;P&gt;And I'm fairly smart.
&lt;P&gt;Again, how could Mom and Pop or Aunt Ida do this?
&lt;P&gt;
Help on my Mac turns up a topic entitled, 
&quot;Time Machine stops backing up to external disk.&quot;
Promising? No. It says to 1. Open Disk Utility and
2. Click the Partitions Tab.
&lt;P&gt;
Funny. No such Tab.
&lt;P&gt;
Apple, this rots.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>E-mail &quot;Stationery&quot;: Just Say &quot;No&quot;</title>
    <link>http://www.avolio.com/weblog/2008/07/08#stationery</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;
Short version: using e-mail 'stetionery' is evil. Don't do it.
&lt;P&gt;
In my posting
&lt;a href=&quot;/weblog/pc2mac/leopard/Goodies.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Leopard: The Good Stuff&lt;/a&gt; I say
&lt;blockquote&gt;
One feature Mail could have 
done without: stationery. Stationery is
terrificfor hand-written mail. All it does is add an 
image attachment
that may or may not be seen as a &quot;background&quot; to the 
e-mail. (Many times it
will not show upit depends on the e-mail client. 
The user will then click
on the attachment to see it and it will make them 
wonder why you send them a fabric swatch.)
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;P&gt; I have repeatedly
suggested against it every time someone has mentioned it in
the Apple discussion forums.
I've written, &quot;As I've stated before on these forums, just
because it looks good in your e-mail client does not mean 
that it will display correctly in someone else's. 
Sometimes the 'stationery' will be transmitted as an 
attachment. The recipient will get your e-mail and an attachment.
They will have to click on the attachment to see it. And 
they will see the 'stationery' only. It would be like sending 
a postal letter with the words written on a plain white 
sheet of paper, and sending along with it a nice piece 
of colored stationery.&quot;
&lt;P&gt;
A friend sent me e-mail the other day. He &quot;signed his name&quot; at the bottom with 
a GIF image of his handwritten name, &quot;Joe.&quot; It, was, of course, an attachment. 
It showed up fine in e-mail, but when I forwarded the message, 
I forwarded his &lt;em&gt;plain text&lt;/em&gt; e-mail plus the attachment with his name.
&lt;P&gt;
Someone else consistently sends me e-mail with a fancy signature image,
containing her company logo. Every time I 
reply&amp;mdash;and include the e-mail&amp;mdash;the fancy signature is sent along. She replies, and now there are two copies if it, and so on.
&lt;P&gt;
You, the sender,  have &lt;em&gt;no control&lt;/em&gt; 
over what the recipients' e-mail client can 
and cannot view. Sticking to plain text e-mail means that you can 
communicate with the greatest number of people. 
If you must have fancy fonts, and colorful backgrounds, send it in a PDF.
&lt;P&gt;
Plain text is best.
&lt;P&gt;
Use Rich Text if you must.
&lt;P&gt;
But, don't use stationery (unless it is in hard-copy, postal mail).
</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Data Classification</title>
    <link>http://www.avolio.com/weblog/2008/07/08#ClassifyThis</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;
I provided some input into an article by writer
Mathew Schwartz, who quotes me in the article
&lt;a href=&quot;http://itpolicycompliance.com/what+s_new/thought_leader_articles/read.asp?ID=47&quot;
target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Classify This! 10 Best Practices to Jumpstart Your Data Classification Program&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;P&gt;
I've often pointed out, here and elsewhere, that there is, as the writer
of Ecclesiates says, &quot;nothing new under the sun.&quot; Mr. Schwartz wrote about
this last week (and it &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; timely and too few of us are doing it). And
I wrote these words in February 1999 (almost 10 years ago).
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Security policy planning entails starting with the mission needs. 
Identify the crown jewels through data classification. 
Classifications might include &quot;dont care,&quot; sensitive, financial, 
competitive, legal, privacy-related, etc.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
Re-read my &lt;em&gt;old&lt;/em&gt; article at
&lt;a href=&quot;/papers/Foundations.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;
Foundations of Enterprise Network Security&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>